A few hours after the capture of Nicolas Madurothe central question is no longer what happened, but what will happen now. The operation ordered by donald trump opens an unprecedented sequence for Venezuela and Latin America: an authoritarian regime beheaded by external military action, without a previously agreed political transition, and with a global power announcing that “will lead the country until a safe transition”. The ambiguity of that phrase encapsulates both the audacity of the movement and its main risk.
In Caracas, the coup left Chavismo in a state of shock. The opposition’s reaction was immediate. Maria Corina Machadofrom an unknown whereabouts, assured that his space is in a position to assume power and pointed out that the logical step is the assumption of Edmundo González Urrutiawinner of the 2024 elections that the regime ignored. Plan that received the explicit support of European leaders such as Emmanuel Macronaligned with a classic institutional exit.
Trump, however, blew up that possibility. He disqualified Machado—“kind, but not prepared”—and suggested that the now president Delcy Rodriguez would be willing to collaborate (as part of the plan already drawn up), although Caracas insists that the only president is Maduro. The message is clear: The United States does not recognize the democratic opposition as the automatic heir to powerand leaves the door open to an exit supervised by sectors of Chavismo itself.
That data feeds two parallel readings. The most cynical maintains that there was a partial agreement with a faction of the regime: an agreed surrender to preserve interests, avoid a bloodbath and allow a controlled reconfiguration of power. The other suggests that Washington managed infiltrate the chavista system. The departure of Leopoldo López from the Spanish embassy, Machado’s movements in Europe and, finally, the capture of Maduro without visible resistance point to an internal break. During his first presidency, Trump bet—hand in hand with today’s chancellor Marco Rubio— to a military defection that never happened. The question is whether that strategy has now matured.
The internal board is fragile. Delcy Rodríguez appears escorted by Diosdado Hairhead of his own faction and with an American arrest warrant. The third actor is the decisive one: the military, led by Vladimir Padrino López. Beyond civil formalities, Venezuela remains a military dictatorship.
The immediate course will depend on the loyalty of the troops and generals, who are linked to the Cartel of the Suns. That is why it is no coincidence that there is talk of a “second wave” of selective captures, control of ports and airports, and a logistical lock to prevent regroupings. After deadheading, the pruning of branches that could dispute control will follow.
In parallel, Trump is advancing with his own plan. Recovering oil concessions for American companies is not an economic detail: it is the heart of the strategy. Reactivate the Venezuelan energy flow under North American tutelage would terminally weaken Cubaalready suffocated by supply cuts, and would reinforce the partition strategy between West and East: America is mine, is Trump’s unequivocal message.
The visit of the Chinese emissary Qiu Xiaoqi to Maduro, hours before his capture, reveals the background: Venezuela is a node in the global dispute over resources. It is not surprising that Beijing invokes international legality and that Moscow suggests mediation: both read the move as a dangerous precedent. But it accordingly enables Moscow in Ukraine, and China against Taiwan.
Meanwhile, Latin America responded divided. Gustavo Petro called for an urgent session of the UN Security Council. Miguel Diaz-Canel He spoke of “state terrorism.” AND Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva He chose balance: he condemned the use of force without mentioning Trump or Maduro. A caution that reveals weakness: the destabilization of a neighbor has immediate migratory impact in Brazil; and Lula feels the pressure to rebuild his relationship with the White House in the face of an election year that may pose challenges.
At the opposite end is Javier Milei. He celebrated the capture without nuances and openly aligned himself with Trump. It was not just an ideological gesture: it is part of a regional project. Milei aspires to lead a pro-Trump right-wing bloc and dreams of a summit in Buenos Aires in 2026with the American president as the star guest. The message he spread – including an image of Lula next to Maduro – sought to establish a continental divide: either you are with Trump or you are with Chavismo. There are no gray areas (although Trump has underground ties with post-Chavismo for economic and global purposes).
Thus, Maduro’s “day after” opens three simultaneous planes. In Venezuela, an uncertain transition, tensioned between the democratic opposition and a residual Chavismo willing to negotiate its survival. In the region, an abrupt reorganization that weakens Brazil, puts Petro in check and elevates Milei’s Argentina as Washington standard bearer. And on the global board, the confirmation of a doctrine: the United States once again exercises hard power in its hemisphere to gain margin against China. And the unknown, as always, is not how to enter into these operations, but how—and at what cost—do you get out of them.
Image gallery
