Luuk Ikink finds it incomprehensible that Linda de Mol has waited three years to say something about her sweetheart Jeroen Rietbergen on camera. “Had just done this a little earlier.”
Who could have thought that after all those sour editorials and that announcement of an overall mediaboycot: Linda de Mol starts to embrace the showers again slowly. She stood in front of the RTL Boulevard camera this week and told in love how all the misery has driven her back into the arms of Jeroen Rietbergen. They are doing so well.
Wisdom teeth
RTL Boulevard even dared to ask Linda a critical question, but they didn’t get much with that. Linda does not want to say anything about the accusations against Jeroen, namely because the Article 12 procedure is still ongoing, and about her prior knowledge in the Ali B case she promises something to say at a later stage.
What does Rob Goossens think? The TV connoisseur says in The BLVD podcast: “Well, she came across as if she had just let two wisdom teeth pull. She really didn’t feel like this conversation, but I hope it was a relief for her, because there was quite okay. “
Difficult conversation
It is good that Linda is finally confronted with the critical outside world, according to Rob. “Of course she did not say everything, but at least she has had the first difficult conversation with a journalist, in this case our own Joost (Maiburg, ed.).”
Colleague Luuk Ikink: “Yes, exactly, I like that too, isn’t it? She now did not want to answer the article 12 procedure and its course. That seems logical to me and I think it is not wisely viewed from a lawyer. She also didn’t want to say anything about how she tackled it with Ali B. ”” ”
Luuk full of incomprehension
Rob does think that Linda should ultimately deliver what she promised. “In fact, she has now promised a kind of: the moment that article 12 procedure is over and Jeroen knows where he stands, that she can answer everything. That seems fine to me. ”
According to Luuk, it is incomprehensible that Linda did not open up a little earlier. “I think of her: had this done two years earlier or something. Then it is also much easier for yourself. Then at some point you will also get rid of it and then you can continue a little faster. It actually took quite a long time. “
Sum
According to Rob, there are still several questions open, for example why Jeroen said in his first confession that Linda already knew about previous misconduct and that is why they broke up (nobody knew that at that time), but that Linda later denied that again. “That sum was weird and that raised questions.”
“We can only guess what happened. The fact is: Peter Plasman is no longer the lawyer of the De Mol family. That’s where the advice came from and also that statement by Jeroen Rietbergen. “
“So interesting!”
There are now two stories: one from Jeroen and one from Linda. Which of the two is lying? Rob: “It could be that afterwards the family was not at all happy with the statement of Jeroen Rietbergen. Then the question is: were they not happy with it because it was wrong or because it was right but the story of Linda made it difficult? ”
Finally, Luuk: “I find it so interesting what exactly happened there. I also think it is almost a bit pathetic for her that it is not about her TV programs, because this part is so interesting. That whole technical background and how exactly it went. “