Margreet Spijker wants to get Omroep WNL on its knees, but is ridiculed by the desk of Shownieuws. And that leads to the anger of Sandra Schuurhof: “This is very false!”
It is actually a bit of mustard after the meal now that Omroepbruut Bert Huisjes has already left WNL, but former presenter of the Omroep Margreet Spijker wants to be revealed to his misconduct through summary proceedings. Why? To test the conclusion that he would have done nothing cross -border behavior.
Wrong Bert
That Bert has misbehaved is obvious, but according to that report he was able to get back to work at WNL and the broadcaster also held on to that for a very long time, until it was really no longer sustainable because of the persistent criticism. However, Margreet disturbs that the WNL top pretended that he had done nothing wrong.
For that reason, Margreet wants to have the bottom stone above and get that report published, but WNL does not want that. “This report is confidential because disclosure would seriously harm the promised privacy of the participants in the investigation,” said the broadcaster.
“Doesn’t matter!”
Sandra Schuurhof also thinks it is a bit of mustard after the meal, but she says in Shownieuws: “Bert Huisjes wanted to stay in the first instance as a result of the report.”
Colleague Frits Huffnagel: “At the Supervisory Board. And that is about that. You now have a supervisory board. ”
Sandra: “Yes, but there were only very good friends in it.”
Frits: “That doesn’t matter at all.”
Sandra: “Of course that matters.”
Frustrated woman
That Margreet is just a frustrated woman, says Botte Hork Frits, who himself Recently sent away From the Supervisory Board of AVROTROS. “I can also say that she was taken off the tube twice with a failed program and then also from the radio through the NPO? If there is frustration somewhere, then I think it’s there! ”
Sandra, who always has a lot to do with all those elderly gentlemen at the desk of Shownieuws, then gets angry. “No, I think that’s really false, because she just worked for WNL.”
“That’s not false!”
Frits does not find himself false. “That’s not false, that’s just how it is.”
Sandra: “She was still just part of WNL, so she made herself very difficult, also because of this fight, but because she stands what she is fighting for …”
Frits: “I don’t believe that at all.”
Sandra: “I very much agree with her. An investigation is being done, nobody knows what exactly has been investigated and what it says. “
‘Don’t have to!
Frits would be fine if that report just stays a secret. “That is not necessary, because it is then the judgment that it could stay at the request of the SB and the Supervisory Board.”
Sandra: “Yes, but those were all people who had put Bert there, so it was a very sensitive point.”
Frits: “The director does not put down people from the RVT at all, that’s not how it works at the broadcaster at all.”
Sandra: “Yes, but those were all big friends. Come on. You know that too. ”
Even more frustrated
Frits thinks Sandra is nonsense. “It is not at all what you say!”
On February 14, the decision was in the case of Margreet against WNL. “The day of love. I think she’s coming back even more frustrated! Hahahaha! ”, Says Frits.
Privacy
Bridget Maasland says in RTL Boulevard That she finds the privacy excuse nonsense. “When it comes to privacy, can you simply cross the names and see the report?”
And colleague Luuk Ikink: “I also think it is so strange that it was never said in advance that it would be an anonymous report, because you could have reported that at the beginning: ‘We are going to investigate something and you will never go there the We will all determine the results of hearing. “