For those who defend Cristina Kirchner no doubts: gerardo milman was behind the assassination attempt on the vice president. For a good part of the macrismo, the linking of her name to the investigation is nothing more than “an operation”. However, anyone who wants to close the issue is wrong -or lying-. So far there are only unanswered questions and the spontaneous declaration of Ivana Bohdziewiczthe deputy’s adviser, did nothing more than fuel suspicions.
that it is about Milman and not from another leader is not minor. Until recently he was the right hand of Patricia Bullrich. and he was his campaign manager until December 2022, when he was displaced. That landslide, however, did not mean that they let go of his hand, and for some it was just a matter of lowering his profile. In space there are those who wonder, in a low voice, why they support it.
Attack on Cristina Kirchner: Milman and her advisers
His appearance at the investigation seemed far-fetched: a witness had stated that two days before the attack on CFK he had heard him say, in a bar, that “when they kill her”, he “would already be on his way to the coast”.
judge mary Eugenia Capuchetti summoned the two women that the witness identified as the companions of Milman, Ivana Bohdziewicz and Carolina Gomez Monaco. First they denied the meeting, but when the investigators showed them the security cameras where they were clearly seen, they had no choice but to acknowledge the meeting. Bohdziewicz added that he remembered that there was talk of a trip to Pinamar, but not particularly about his boss.
That first lie, in a strange way, did not surprise the Justice too much, which ignored the requests of CFK’s defense to examine the cell phones and, until the last week, there had been no news. However, when Friday the 5th bohdziewicz appeared spontaneously to testify, everything changed.
The secretary said that in November her partner Gomez Monaco He quoted her in a cafe and told her that Milman had proposed that an expert erase the information from the phones. In theory, the fear was leaks and she feared because she had intimate photos. After the talk, they went to an office at Avenida de Mayo 953 and a man deleted the data. Besides, bohdziewicz He stated that the expert recommended his partner buy another phone and not turn hers over to Justice.
bohdziewicz she was fired from the team in January and now faced an individual strategy. That’s why she turned to the lawyer Rafael Diaz Baque to return to Comodoro Py: “I sponsored her in the letter in which she requested to expand her testimony. I cannot say anything about the statement itself since he did not participate, ”he told NEWS.
In the media that aligned themselves with the hypothesis of the operation, they point out that the professional was convicted of fraud and suggest that there is something strange behind the step taken by the adviser. In the universe of speculation everything is possible. However, so far it is only clear that Bohdziewicz’s revelation targets Milman, who remains in the most absolute silence. Bullrich herself, consulted on the subject, limited herself to answering vague questions. Nothing to say?
Who is Gerardo Milman?
Milman He is from Avellaneda and was a GEN legislator. He was also director of AFSCA representing the opposition until 2015, when he joined the macrismo. The removal of him from Daisy Stolbizer It was not on the best terms, although his old colleagues remember that he promoted the union of space with Cambiemos and, therefore, they did not feel it as a betrayal.
His greatest exposure came as Secretary of Homeland Security in the management of Bullrich in safety. In case of santiago maldonado He put him in contact with the media and the Maldonado family points him out as the person responsible for the bad investigation. In the PRO, for a long time, they vindicated him as the man who knew the most about the Mapuche question and in conversations with the press he circulated crazy reports about the supposed international ramifications of the Mapuches. In the PDF that he sent there was personal information of leaders and journalists and forced associations. His influence was such that the theory was headlined in the press on more than one occasion.
The kindest to Milman They say that he enjoys appearing, but that he is not the monster that the ruling party describes. In Comodoro Py they emphasize that they recovered the information from the cell phone of bohdziewicz and that the investigation continues. But what did he want to delete and why?
