Peter Gillis may have to start hoeing for a while, because the Public Prosecution Service has demanded 140 hours of community service for the alleged abuse of his ex-girlfriend Nicol Kremers. “He’s still lucky!”
According to Victor Vlam, it is downright shocking what Peter Gillis is suspected of in the assault case surrounding his ex-girlfriend Nicol Kremers. Yet he was only sentenced to 140 hours of community service. How is that possible? According to an ex-catering employee of Peter Gillis, Samir, the holiday park magnate has gotten away with this demand very well.
‘Right in front of my nose’
Samir tells Story that on May 29, 2022, he was present at the Prinsenmeer holiday park in Ommel. This ex-employee, who is in conflict with Peter about his severance pay, says: “I know what I saw and what happened that evening, on May 29, 2022. I also stated this to the police.”
He continues: “Then I am talking about the abuse of Nicole by Peter Gillis. That evening I worked behind the bar in the Caribbean Bar at the Prinsenmeer holiday park in Ommel, where we had a live music evening. Peter and Nicol’s argument started at the bar, right in front of me.”
Against the mirror
At one point Nicol went to the toilet, says Samir. “And Peter went after her. The situation looked threatening, so I decided to go after it too. In the toilet it escalated and Peter grabbed Nicol by her hair and hit her head hard against the mirror. That was really terrible to see. Nicol was crying.”
He continues: “At that moment, more people joined, they all observed the abuse, but to this day they do not want to explain it. That is because they still have good contact with Peter, some still work for him.”
Butt lickers
Why didn’t those people testify to the police? “They are all dirty ass lickers from Peter. But I am not afraid, I am telling the truth. What I saw is so intense, I will not and cannot forget it.”
After the incident in the toilet, Peter and Nicol left for their chalet further away in the park, where the police came. According to Peter, Samir’s statement is shaky. He responds: “My lawyer told the court that Samir’s statement is at odds with Nicol’s. They have stated a contradiction.”