The Canadian seemed destined to lead the bianconeri’s attack, then slowly he lost positions in Tudor’s hierarchies. And with Atalanta he even remained to look …
All fault … Bremer’s effort. Or maybe not. “Too bad not having been able to take advantage of the last change with Jonathan David”, Tudor’s regretted at the end of the draw obtained by his Juve against Atalanta. But the need to insert Cabal, who still signed the 1-1 network, forced the Canadian to observe for all ninety minutes from the bench. A fact that cannot fail to raise doubts in the Juventus house: how did it pass by an attacker who seemed to be designated to be the center forward of Juve to one who played just 91 minutes of the last 360?
Juve and the paradox of the abundance of the nine
–
After working for six months with the form with two midfielders and a center forward, the Croatian technician found himself having to deal with the bulky presence of three nine numbers, one of which (Vlahovic), among other things, has shown on the field that he has no intention to accept the role of third choice. So, after playing the first two tenders in black and white, David found himself from 1 ‘only once in the last 4, with the misery of just 31 minutes on the pitch in the last three championship games. And the need to play out of role (decentralized on the right) on the only occasion (against Borussia in the Champions League) in which he started as a starter. Therefore, the question remains that the Juventus coach has clear the characteristics of the players at his disposal and how to use them at the best: “David wants to play near the door, OPENDA only wants space and when they play they have to adapt. I have to be good at making them play in the system we adopt”, reiterated Juve coach after 1-1 against Atalanta. So why choose the former Leipzig from the beginning for a team that had 67% of the ball possession and never had the opportunity to act as a remittance? Probably, it was not all fault … Bremer’s effort.