The pass between Eduardo Feinmann and Pablo Rossi in A24 started with an issue that crosses the ruling party and public opinion: the forms of Javier Milei. Rossi opened the fire by raising that there was a media brace that day: “I saw that today there was a bracelet: ‘Is it authentic or is it not the authentic? Are you acting or not?'” Immediately, Feinmann interrupted him without turns: “What does it matter?”
The context was not accidental. The last national chain, in which Milei presented the 2026 budget with a surprisingly calm and impassive tone, ignited the discussion. The contrast with its usual shouts and outbursts resulted in a new round of criticism: some accuse him of overact moderation, others of having lost freshness.
“We are in the same,” Rossi replied to his partner. And Feinmann completed: “If the president out there decides to take another direction in the ways, in the way of communicating, in the way of communicating … Welcome! If it was what was being claimed, or not?” Rossi agreed and closed with: “It is pure political pragmatism.”
The best moment came when Feinmann, visibly annoying, had him rossi and pointed against those who question the part of the president and laps: “You are like the flora cat, there is no m … that it comes well, old. If he shouts, shouts; and if he does not shout, he does not shout. If he says’ Long live the freedom, he It will be happening to you ‘… Para, older! What is the problem?
The outburst portrayed the journalist crudely wanted to highlight: that Milei is criticized what to do. If he raises the tone, they accuse him of overflowing; If a change goes down, of imposing. In that double standard, according to Feinmann, it hides much of the political wear and tear facing the president.
At a time when the Casa Rosada seeks to show a more content and presidential Milei, the reaction of A24 drivers reflects the discomfort generated by permanent criticisms of the president’s forms.
