The political impact of the scandal that exploded after the dissemination of the audios of Diego Spagnuolo —Ex head of the National Disability Agency– It is no longer measured in courts and in Congress, but also in social perception. A national survey of Management & Fit It reveals that the case reached an unusual level of knowledge: 94.5% of those consulted said they were aware of what happenedan indicator that places it among the episodes of greatest public impact of recent months.
Far from relativizing it, most respondents place the episode in a critical plane: 73.2% consider it between very serious, while only a minority minimizes it. As for the veracity of the accusations, 59.2% believe that the denounced audios and corruption acts are true, which reflects a high level of credibility around the leaks.
The survey also investigates responsibilities. 26.8% points to all national management, but a 24.5% directly point to Karina Mileisister of the president and key figure in the assembly of freedom progresses. If the mentions of Javier Milei and the Menem are added, the level of attribution of responsibilities exceeds 60%, a sensitive fact for the ruling party.
More than half of the consulted, 56.1%, admit that the scandal modified its confidence level in national management, which shows political damage that transcends the conjunctural. However, most do not project that loss of confidence towards the electoral field. 82.6% ensure that what happened does not modify their vote for the legislative, which shows a critical electorate but stable in their alignments.
The most forceful fact is that 8 out of 10 respondents (81%) claim a public response from President Javier Milei, demanding a clear explanation about what happened. This point opens a dilemma for the government: the scandal hits trust, but not necessarily erodes the vote; However, the absence of an official response could deepen the perception of opacity.
The Spagnuolo case settled on the public agenda strongly and left an ambiguous scenario: citizenship perceives it as serious, holds the circle closest to the president and claims explanations, but shows no intention of altering their electoral behavior. In this tension between the indignation and the stability of the vote, the true political impact of a scandal that still does not find closure is played.
You may also interest you
By rn
Image gallery
