“What should Netanyahu do then?” Early opinion maker Bram Moszkowicz. News of the day. “Maybe stop starving, throwing bombs on hospitals or making a distinction between Gazanen and Hamas?” suggested his fellow guest, writer Lale Gül. That was not the intention: to answer a rhetorically intended question, and so Moszkowicz just asked him again. Presenter Malou Petter asked the question back: what did he think that Netanyahu should do?
That was not relevant, he had easy talking as a guest, but what he just wondered was: “What should Netanyahu do?” Moszkowicz was happy with the video of Hamas in which the emaciated hostage player David could be seen. The David family has called on not to share the video: “Now the whole world sees what rig Hamas is.” And we had to be: “Israel had not started the war.” The images of those children were pathetic, but “those children had a disease that made them look like that.” That also hurt Moszkowicz, but “there are plenty of iPhones in Gaza and other images that showed the famine were not.” So the question remained: what should Netanyahu do?
Blinkers without historical awareness; It is always disappointing when someone who has worked in the judiciary has so little knowledge. But Moszkowicz added a scoop of conspiracy theory: the UN, Human Rights Watch and Amnesty could say that a humanitarian disaster happened, but they were not “neutral.” “Not neutral when it came to Israel,” he added, as if he was coming over more nuanced.
Also in The Oranjezomer The Hamas movies were discussed on SBS6. It was a bit more nuanced than with colleagues earlier that evening, until Jack van Gelder decided to make a contribution. He had not been on TV for a while, but this evening ‘he was allowed to go’. Entertainment: the abolition of days off as a second day of Pentecost and Easter Monday was awarding Dutch values. By the way, you were allowed to “not say everything on TV anymore”, but he still wanted to give his opinion about Gaza. “You will have to do things in a certain way brightenHe said without a trace of embarrassment about his choice of words.
Slagter vs Eus
Of greater importance on TV, the issue between the broadcaster of Max, Jan Slagter, and the writer and presenter Özcan Akyol. The latter had at Summer Casters Not his apologies that he had thrown Matthijs van Nieuwkerk in front of the bus. ” Reason for Slagter to announce through the media that EUS program Stars on the canvas From 2026 no longer had to present.
It is unacceptable to make a watch through the media, but Eus became the culprit in various programs. Moszkowicz thought it was overly of Eus that he had used the word “unsafe,” he sniffed a bit unsafe. Bee RTL Boulevard She also understood Slagter, “he was just emotional.” They had made a joke: “Not worth the Eus”. Also at Shownieuws On SBS6 there was a “word joke”: “The program continues, but not Eus”. And, they concluded at the table: the statement that Eus had written, which was not yet a4, was “endless”. “He writes as well as he cuts. Not very well,” they joked to immediately suggest that Eus had not written a novel himself. A striking statement for men who already find an A4-tje a “endless” text.
Around that time the viewer had long been messing around: Dutch values are being torn, “there is no starvation in Gaza” and Eus may “flicker”. This way everything became clear and answered. Apart from that one question then.