In addition to aspects such as that it may also require courtesy in the industry. In most industries, it would be uniformly unpainting potential future business partners because of such banalities, even if you don’t get a denominator in the deal, it is burdening opportunities for the future.
Doesn’t the courtesy do not inform the other club if the player still has such a long contract?
Isn’t that also unclear to cheat a potential business partner?
It was often said of the Bavaria that you have a very good relationship with VfB.
But do you do that to go behind someone and deliver him in front of completed tatters?
Is that the way you deal with each other?
I can’t find it now.
This is already I deeper Whataboutism and does not replace anything of my argument, but:
First of all: I would also like it when everyone speaks to the club beforehand that gives the player. Whether the FCB, VfB or whoever.
There are now 2 options:
1. It is a thesis that is now so common in business that every club does it – this does not exclude VfB.
2. It didn’t happen.
I think that if one of the two points would not apply, then you would have screamed at another level at VfB. And rightly so.
I can’t judge something for which there is no evidence. So far, this is just an assertion of you and/or a few media that all parroted the Springerverlag. How do we not know that the FCB has informed VfB?
So yes, if you have behaved unauthorized and illegally, then it should also be sentenced. Or if everyone does it anyway, it is probably a senseless regulation. All in all, this is still not a legitimation of what I think is criticizing at VfB?