Tina Nijkamp attacks her fellow TV critic Angela de Jong because, according to Johnny de Mol, she does not want to sit on the crutch of the Oranjezomer. “That is of course a bit weird.”
It is Angela de Jongs Baan to evaluate TV programs and presenters in her column and in the case of Johnny de Mol, that-entirely rightly-does not unpain it. The presenter obviously does not bake anything at all, but the billionaire son himself does not recognize it. He states that Angela wrote her last column from Rancune.
Rancune or not?
Johnny canceled Angela of the week at the last minute, because there would be urgent American news and therefore he had chosen Raymond Mens again. A nonsense argument of course: because of her razor -sharp criticism of Johnny, Angela at the table was much more interested in the viewer than the umpteenth time Raymond Mens.
As an alternative, Angela was offered the bar stool, where Raymond could of course have been fine. According to Johnny, Angela refused that and then that negative column was published about him. In fact, Johnny is the only one who thinks it is resentment: at the table it was immediately questioned by both Raymond and Olcay Gulsen.
Tina attacks
Tina Nijkamp, who has been shown at Johnny on the bar stool in the past period, now gets In her podcast out to Angela. “Johnny also said that she did not want to take a seat on the stool. Well, that is of course a bit strange if that is the case. Why would she not want to sit on the stool?”
“Why she didn’t want to sit on that stool, I don’t know. That is of course a bit strange. And in terms of column … What I think of that … I got a lot of questions about that. I have Angela very high, I think she is a good columnist. What is striking is that it is so two times a month.”
Repeat
What does Tina mean by that? “Well, because a month ago she already had a column about Johnny de Mol as a presenter of the Oranjezomer … This was already the second. That might be a bit much. I thought it was a bit too much a repeat, that column.”
She continues: “I certainly did not think it was one of her best columns, because I also thought it was very easy to bashen from Johnny de Mol, while she had already taken it a lot a month ago in her column.”
Dull
This is of course a strange comment from the mouth of Tina. Angela’s follow -up column about Johnny was indeed relevant because she could evaluate his development as a presenter after a month. Short summary: That development was not there.
Tina can of course be blamed exactly the same when she repeatedly and persistently returns to the low viewing figures of a certain program on her analysis channel. That is not bashen, that is just evaluating. Well, let’s keep it that Tina has always had a good time on the after -drink at Johnny.
At the table
Incidentally, Tina knows that Angela will join the Oranjezomer next week. “She would be seen next week at the table at the Oranjezomer, but of course when Thomas van Groningen presents it.”
At the table that is. It can of course be very good that Angela finds that unflatter stool a bit uncomfortable. Earlier she had difficulty with the unsoving bench in Goedemorgen Nederland. “I understand – that his strong rumors, I have not received it – that she will be sitting at the table next week.”
Well, let’s hope that the studio lamps at Talpa then stay on the ceiling …