Nsubstantial ovities on the Garlasco case in the last episode of Who saw it? Aired tonight on Rai 3. On the crucial day of the evidentiary accident, a blood stain under the croissant of the Poggi house phone could rewrite the story of the most controversial crime of the last 20 years. Federica Sciarelli, Together with the correspondent Vittorio Romano He interviewed the lawyer Massimo Lovati again. .
Who saw it?Case Garlasco, Andrea Semplio: “I never entered the Poggi house that morning”
Chiara would have breakfast with people and subsequently attempted to reach the phone to ask for help. On food residues e On the notorious “fruit”, there could be the imprints of the probable assassins. Faced with these finds, to the microphones of Who saw it? Andrea Semplio a few weeks ago said he was quiet And that he never entered the Poggi house that morning.
The lawyer Lovati, Instead, reacted tonight vehemently. «Where is the measure of a judge who at the time ordered the garbage, were these finds seized or not? The seizure loses effectiveness when the sentence is judged and the seized things must be returned ».
“I will oppose because this thing is surreal”. «This fruit does not exist because it has never been seized by a public prosecutor. A report by the carabinieri is worth nothing for me ». And, he still reiterates how much he fits and clearly loved each other, that he is truly innocent but he has never entered the house.
Andrea Semplio’s lawyers to “Who has seen it?”. (Rai)
Garlasco case: the footprints on the phone and fruit, who are they?
There has been talk of some salient episodes on the day of the evidentiary accident. Trust trace of blood was found among the imprints analyzed, not even in number 10what investigators think can be of the murderer.
Another relevant fact during the direct: In the video shot by the Ris in the year of the murderclearly feels that The two insiders exclaimed that someone would move the biscuits from the sofa to the table. A now polluted scene?
Finally, the two footprints on the phone. Who they are? In the old files of investigation it appears that they have never been taken into consideration. Why?
Who saw it? episode June 18: the yellow of Villa Pamphilj
So the information comes to those who saw it? Regarding the terrible crime Of Villa Pamphilj. Federica Sciarelli, with the help of her faithful spectators, managed to give precious information to the investigators, giving a name to the murderer of the mother and daughter, buried in the park of the capital. It is Francis Kaufmann, American citizen who passed off as a well -known director with many names such as Rexal Ford or Matteo Capozzi.
What adds pain to pain were the numerous reports in the days preceding their disappearance. Tanti the alarming episodes in which man, in the company of the woman and the girl, He proved himself with them and in aggressive and drunk public. Passers saw him several times beating the woman violently and force the girl to drink wine.
Despite the numerous reports, the police, intervened several times, have not seen the need to investigate further. June 5thwith a voice message, Kaufmann told an acquaintance that the girlfriend he had abandoned him For a richer man, leaving him only with the girl. The womanhowever,, whose identity was not yet known, had already died.
The note in the documents of the Garlasco file to “Who has seen it?”. (Rai)
Who saw it? disappeared, the other cases
The strange death of Artur Karaboja. The Forty -year -old Artur until 31 July 2016, he lived with his companion beautician and the two children among the woods of the Val di Non (Trento). After a stormy family periodman he would call his partner on his cell phone and then he would get hanged in the attic of their home.
The description of the discovery never convinced Artur’s sister. 10 years laterthe man’s body was re -examined and analyzed by a medical examiner. Now We investigate for suspicious murder.
The sad news on the Nessy Guerra case. The woman and her little girl are still seized in Egypt. THE‘ex -husband, who had unjustly accused her of adultery and who would like to have the exclusive custody of his daughter, was acquitted of accusations and released free After 82 days in prison.
In a rather emblematic video, celebrating the event by threatening the Italian state to ask for a lot of money as compensation. A rather complex and painful situation.
I woman © RESERVED REPRODUCTION