Ruben Nicolai believes that Peter Gillis will suffer considerably from the lawsuit on the abuse of his abuse. “Apparently more has to be done than just the word ‘fraud’.”
You would think that in 2025 it is unthinkable to keep someone on the tube if they are sentenced to a serious prison sentence, but John de Mol is involved. Peter Gillis who commits tax fraud? Ah, John de Mol also has a construction here and there: thanks to a handy trap he has been publishing since 2012 (!) no annual figures.
Half a million
John hugs Peter completely lamb. Sentenced to six months in prison? Oh well, mass is cash register just through! After all, Peter can also appeal and then in cassation, calls the reality series. This concerns the case about tax fraud, and then the lawsuit on the mistreatment of his ex-girlfriend Nicol Kremers must follow.
Ruben Nicolai thinks it is separate that Peter just stays on the tube and that his supporters remain faithful to him. “If you only read the article today, you will read the word ‘fraud’ and ‘abuses’, but nothing else. I have not heard or read that half a million in any case. So you can’t imagine that,” he says at the table at the table Renze.
Abstract
It is too abstract for people, Ruben thinks. “I can imagine that people think of: fraud, abuses …”
Madegast Angela de Jong then: “It is Witteborden …”
Ruben: “Exactly, but if the following case states:” Bitten in the nose, “and” bitten in the back, “I think it can go faster …”
In the nose
Bitten in the nose? Oh yes, we all forgot that together again. His ex Nicol was bitten by Peter in her back and nose, pushed against the wall, pinched into her breasts and pulled her ears, arms and hair, says the public prosecutor. And there is serious evidence for that. John de Mol is also fine. Profession, cassation …
Talk show host Renze Klamer also thinks that the tax fraud does not really arrive at the people: “It is not at all neat and also very forbidden, but it is more that you think: what a crazy, what a crook, but not …”
Look no more
Ruben thinks Peter will eventually be punished. “If you indeed want to get public opinion to you that you are no longer broadcast, then I think more should be done than the word ‘fraud’ in the newspaper.”
Angela: “I am curious what will happen if there is Nicol’s lawsuit and that he is found guilty of abuse, for example.”
Ruben: “I think people say rather:” Then I don’t want to look at it anymore. “
What does Talpa do?
What does Talpa do then? Angela wonders, against better judgment. “I am curious what Talpa will do, because you can also appeal that, right?”
Frits Wester: “I think there have been people for less from the tube lately.”
Renze: “That’s right, but perhaps not at Talpa. The border may be slightly different than with some other broadcasters.”
Angela: “You make a kind of middle finger to society.”